Current Ideas: A Blog by Jeffrey A. Schaler

I've created this blog--"Current Ideas"--to share news and views related to my teaching, writing, and interests. If you want to post something, please keep it brief and to the point. Good contact is the appreciation of difference. There's no limit on opinions or information posting, but the tone of this blog is one of reasonably civilized discussion. Hate material is out, as well as unsupported extreme personal attacks.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Maryland, United States

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

4th Circuit "vacate Hurwitz’s convictions and remand for a new trial." August 22, 2006

Cf. pdf version of the decision at http://www.schaler.net/usaversushurwitz2006.pdf
http://www.reason.com/hitandrun/2006/08/hurwitz_convict.shtml#015242 http://www.painreliefnetwork.org/

PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ü UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM ELIOT HURWITZ,
Defendant-Appellant.

...2 UNITED STATES v. HURWITZ

OPINION
TRAXLER, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted Dr. William E. Hurwitz of multiple counts of
drug trafficking for prescribing narcotic pain medicine in violation of
21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (West 1999). Hurwitz appeals,
arguing, inter alia, that the district court improperly admitted evidence
recovered in a search of his office and incorrectly instructed the
jury on the law. Although we affirm the district court’s decision to
admit the evidence seized in the search, we conclude that the district
court did not properly instruct the jury on the controlling law. Accordingly,we vacate Hurwitz’s convictions and remand for a new trial....

1 Comments:

Blogger Nicolas Martin said...

This is good news, but it appears that Dr. Hurwitz still faces long odds when he is tried again, as surely will happen. Though I entirely oppose any regulation of drug use or of physician practice, some of Hurwitz's behavior seems to have been imprudent in light of the present state of law, especially since his practice had already been the subject of national media coverage.

As always, it is painful to read the nonsense that the court disgorges about drugs. Imagine what Jefferson would have thought of imprisonment hinging of whether "good faith" is objective or subjective.

8:58 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home